Kamis, 25 Agustus 2011
Four Indians among MIT's top 35 innovators
Won't die till Jan Lokpal Bill is passed - Anna Hazare
Rabu, 24 Agustus 2011
Pics: Steve Jobs quits as Apple CEO
Steve Jobs stands beneath a photograph of him and Apple-co founder Stev Wozniak |
Salman Khan prefers Karan Johar over Shah Rukh Khan
Reliance's plans of releasing the Don 2 first trailer with Salman Khan's Bodyguard have been squashed. Thanks to lead actor Salman. The dabangg Khan refused to share screen space with his archrival Shah Rukh Khan in any way.
However, when it came to sharing the spotlight with Hrithik Roshan and Sanjay Dutt, Salman did not seem to have a problem. In fact, Sallu insisted on having Karan Johar's Agneepath trailer as a part of his forthcoming Eid release.
Salman had asked Reliance not to include the Don 2 trailer in Bodyguard. In fact, when the producers tried to reason things out with the actor, telling him that both films (Bodyguard and Don 2) belonged to Reliance, he retorted, "Bodyguard is my film as well."
"Salman and SRK are not friends. It was obvious that Salman will not want the trailer of Shah Rukh Khan's film attached to Bodyguard. Salman would have said 'No' even if he had a guest appearance in the film. His war with SRK is far from over," said a source close to the Sallu starrer.
The SRK-Salman war started on July 16, 2008 at Katrina Kaif's 24th birthday bash in a suburban nightspot.
A small argument turned ugly when SRK allegedly commented on Salman's ex-girlfriend Aishwarya Rai.
While SRK's Don 2 trailer has been left out from Bodyguard, his good friend Karan Johar's Agneepath promo has been included. And again, it was Salman who took the call. "It would have made more sense for Reliance to include the promo of Don 2, since it releases this December as opposed to Agneepath that releases in 2012. but since Salman wanted it, the producers couldn't refuse," revealed a source.
Explaining why Salman chose Agneepath over Don 2, a source said, "Salman has been bonding with Karan Johar of late.
According to industry insiders, the actor will work in the Dharma Productions venture to be directed by Rensil D'Silva. Also, Agneepath stars Hrithik Roshan and Sanjay Dutt, two actors who had once had a spat with Salman but are now close to him."
The final print of Bodyguard that releases this Eid will now have trailers of Agneepath, Luv U Soniyo and Hollywood film Real Steel. "There is neither a trailer or a promo of Don 2 in Bodyguard. Salman did not want any mention of the SRK starrer in his film," confirmed a source close to Sallu's film.
Steve Jobs quits as Apple CEO, Cook takes over
Steve Jobs resigned as CEO of Apple Inc on Wednesday and passed the reins to his right-hand man Tim Cook, saying he could no longer fulfill the duties in a bombshell announcement that raised fears his health has deteriorated further.
Jobs, who fought and survived a rare form of pancreatic cancer and revolutionized the technology arena with the iPhone and the iPad in the past four years, is deemed the heart and soul of a company that this month briefly became the most valuable in America.
"I have always said if there ever came a day when I could no longer meet my duties and expectations as Apple's CEO, I would be the first to let you know. Unfortunately, that day has come," Jobs, who takes on the new position of chairman, said in a short letter announcing his resignation.
The letter and a separate terse, somewhat cryptic statement from Apple raised more questions than it answered about Jobs' health and the future of the company.
While it's unlikely that his departure as CEO will derail Apple's ambitious product-launch roadmap in the near term, there are concerns about whether the company would stay a creative force to be reckoned with beyond the next year or so without its founder and visionary at the helm.
That is why Apple's stock dropped as much as 7 percent in after-hours trading when Jobs' departure was announced.
In the company statement, Apple co-lead director Art Levinson on behalf of the board praised Jobs' "extraordinary vision and leadership" and "countless contributions to Apple's success", saying he would continue to serve the company with "unique insights, creativity and inspiration."
However, the statement, which also talked about Cook's outstanding performance, said nothing about Jobs' health.
His battle with pancreatic cancer, which has stretched over several years, has been of deep concern to Apple fans, investors and the company's board. Over the past two years, even board members have confided to friends their concern that Jobs, in his quest for privacy, wasn't being forthcoming with directors about the true condition of his health.
Jobs has been on medical leave since January 17, with his duties being filled by Cook, who was chief operating officer.
Jobs spent all Wednesday meeting with board members and top managers at Apple's headquarters at 1 Infinite Loop in Cupertino, and plans to remain active in his new role, a source close to Jobs told Reuters. A second source said Jobs will remain on the board of Walt Disney Co.
Still, some industry insiders express concern that Jobs' has clearly signaled he is too ill to keep up the punishing pace of a top executive job.
The 56-year-old Jobs had briefly emerged from medical leave in March to unveil the latest iPad and later attended a dinner hosted by President Barack Obama for technology leaders in Silicon Valley. But his often-gaunt appearance had sparked questions about how bad his illness was and his ability to continue at Apple.
In each of Jobs' three health-related absences, Cook has taken over the helm. But the 50-year-old Alabama native, a former Compaq executive and an acknowledged master of supply-chain management, remains largely untested in Wall Street's view.
That's partly why, despite Cook being viewed as a safe bet to run Apple's sprawling empire, some still think his boss will be very badly missed. One Silicon Valley CEO, who declined to be identified because of the sensitive issues involved, said the tone of Jobs' statement indicated his health might be worse than publicly known.
Jobs has earned a reputation for commanding every aspect of operations - from day-to-day running to broad strategic decisions - suggesting he would not have given up the job if he had a choice.
"It's really sad," the CEO told Reuters. "No one is looking at this as a business thing, but as a human thing. No one thinks that Steve is just stepping aside because he just doesn't want to be CEO of Apple anymore."
"It feels like another shoe is going to drop."
AGAIN, DEEP BENCH
Fans paid tribute but lamented his resignation, openly airing fears for the health of their technology guiding light. Employees at a downtown San Francisco Apple store huddled in small groups after the news spread through word of mouth.
"Not gonna lie - I teared up upon the #stevejobs news," said Bob Skrezyna, who goes by 'wordrebel' on Twitter.
Some reactions were put in crudely poetic, though somewhat poignant, terms. One Apple fan from Denmark posted on Facebook: "Good Job. I just ate an Apple. It was bittersweet. Guess I'll just have to Cook it from now on."
Others simply sympathized.
"It's sad to see someone visibly deteriorating and to see such a giant going through this. My heart goes out to his wife and kids," said Kelli Praught, an employee at a Palo Alto business who has served Jobs' wife.
The news caused immediate ripples in Asia, where many of the company's major suppliers and rivals are based. Samsung Electronics, Apple's top chip supplier and a major rival in smartphones and tablets, rose 3 percent in early trade, though part of that was because of a patent ruling in a court battle with Apple in the Netherlands. Sony Corp, which was overtaken by Apple in the personal music and tablet space, rose 1 percent.
While Jobs did not detail the state of his health, oncologists who have not treated the Apple founder said he could be facing several problems tied to his rare form of pancreatic cancer and subsequent liver transplant. They include possible hormone imbalances or a recurrence of cancer that is harder to fight once the body has already been weakened.
"I have to imagine that it's related to his health. I cannot imagine another explanation," said Jason Hirschhorn of The ReDEF Group, and the former CEO of MySpace.
His resignation certainly marked the end of an era at Apple.
A college dropout, a Buddhist and a son of adoptive parents, he started Apple Computer with friend Steve Wozniak in the late 1970s.
The company soon introduced the Apple 1 computer. But it was the Apple II that became a huge success and gave Apple its position as a critical player in the then-nascent PC industry, culminating in a 1980 IPO that made Jobs a multimillionaire.
Despite the subsequent success of the Mac, Jobs' relationship with internal management soured, and in 1985 the board removed most of his powers fired him.
Apple's fortunes waned after that. However, its purchase of NeXT -- the computer company Jobs founded after leaving Apple -- in 1997 brought him back into the fold. Later that year, he became interim CEO and in 2000, the company dropped "interim" from his title.
But it was the iPhone in 2007 that cemented his legacy in the annals of modern technology history. Two years before the gadget that forever transformed the way people around the world access and use the Internet, Jobs talked about how a sense of his mortality was a major driver behind that vision.
"Remembering that I'll be dead soon is the most important tool I've ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life," Jobs said during a Stanford commencement ceremony in 2005. "Because almost everything -- all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure -- these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important."
"Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart."
Google Inc Chairman Eric Schmidt, a friend of Jobs for years before the Internet search giant's move into mobile software and devices strained their relationship, wrote a moving testament to the legacy of his erstwhile business partner, echoing the responses of many of his fellow Silicon Valley executives on Wednesday.
"Steve Jobs is the most successful CEO in the U.S. of the last 25 years, "he said. "He uniquely combined an artist's touch and an engineer's vision to build an extraordinary company... One of the greatest American leaders in history."
Wall Street once again expressed confidence in the Apple bench, headed by supply-chain maven Cook.
"I will say to investors: don't panic and remain calm, it's the right thing to do. Steve will be chairman and Cook is CEO," said BGC Financial analyst Colin Gillis.
On Wednesday, Apple shares slid to $357.40 in extended trading after a brief halt. They had gained 0.7 percent to close at $376.18 on the Nasdaq.
"Investors are very comfortable with Tim Cook even though Jobs has been a driver of innovation and clearly an Apple success. Tim has shown Apple can still outperform extremely well when he's been acting as CEO," said Cross Research analyst Shannon Cross.
Apple previously did not have a chairman. The company had said it didn't need one, the structure worked best for shareholders, and that it preferred to rely on two independent co-lead directors.
In his letter of just eight short sentences that was addressed to the board and Apple community, Jobs said: "I hereby resign as CEO of Apple. I would like to serve, if the Board sees fit, as Chairman of the Board, director and Apple employee."
They did see fit.
Selasa, 23 Agustus 2011
Facebook changes privacy settings
Facebook has announced a major revamp of how users control their privacy on the site.
Among the changes, items posted online will each have their own sharing settings determining who can see them.
It is the latest in a long line of attempts by Facebook to streamline how members manage their personal information.
In the past, the social network has been criticised for seeming to bury privacy settings in obscure menus.
Postings will have their own unique privacy settings
Now when users are tagged in a posting - such as a photograph or video - they will have the option to confirm or remove their identity before it appears on their profile.
It is hoped the safeguard will eliminate the problem of malicious tagging, which is often used by cyberbullies who add other people's names to unpleasant images.
Other changes include:
- In line controls - each item on a user's wall has individual privacy options, such as public, friends and custom
- Tag takedown - the ability to remove tags of self, ask the person who tagged you to remove it, or block the tagger
- Universal tagging - users can tag anyone, not just Facebook friends. Other person can choose not to accept the tagged post on their profile
- Location tagging - geographic locations can be added in all versions of Facebook, not just mobile app
- Profile view - the option to see how others view your profile is added above the news feed
Facebook's vice president of product, Chris Cox said that the arrival of another privacy refresh didn't necessarily mean the old system was confusing.
"I don't think the old controls were bad. I just think the new ones are much better," he told BBC News.
"The goal is just to make [the settings] more inline and more immediate, just right there in the profile."
Users can ask for tags of them to be removed or have the content deleted completely
Mr Cox also played down suggestions that Facebook might be improving its privacy controls as it prepares to extend access to children under 13 - something its founder Mark Zuckerberg has said he would like to see.
"This change is really just about the people that are on Facebook today and the new users who just joined today and making it easier for them.
"This really is not in any way about the under-13 experience," said Mr Cox.
He promised there would not be any unexpected changes to users' privacy settings during the changeover process.
The first time Facebook members share a piece of content, their default suggestion will be public - which replaces the "everyone" setting. If users select another option, that will become their default in future.
The new privacy options will begin to be rolled out across the site from Thurdsay 25 August.
Senin, 22 Agustus 2011
Govt tentatively moves for talks with Anna Hazare
Anti-graft activist Anna Hazare's hunger strike entered its seventh day on Monday with opposition parties calling for nationwide rallies this week, prompting the government of Premier Manmohan Singh to take tentative steps to open talks.
The 74-year-old Hazare, who has shed five kgs (11 lbs), spent the seventh day of his fast lying down on a makeshift stage at Ramlila grounds in New Delhi as electric fans cooled him in the humid monsoon heat. Temperatures reached into the mid-30s Celsius (95 Fahrenheit).
Hazare's supporters and the government said at the weekend they are open to talks, with Singh saying there was a "lot of scope for give and take."
But a prominent Hazare supporter said that the government had so far shown caution.
"The government sent an innocuous three page, unsigned note yesterday which summarised their position -- as if we need to know that," Kiran Bedi, a former police officer and one of India's best known anti-graft campaigners who works with Hazare, told Reuters.
Moves to open talks come as the Bharatiya Janata Party is organising a nationwide protest against the government on Thursday, while a group of left parties is planning a national protest on Tuesday.
Singh continued to strike a more conciliatory tone on Monday than when Hazare's fast first began after he was jailed by the government last week in a ham-handed move to thwart the hunger strike.
"The standing committee has the power to propose any amendment or amendments," Singh said in Kolkata, referring to a parliamentary body looking at an anti-corruption bill before parliament that lies at the heart of the standoff.
In another sign of possible compromise, Jairam Ramesh, a minister and Congress Party stalwart, publicly lent support to Hazare's demand that his team only negotiate with mediators from the prime minister's office or with Rahul Gandhi, the son of the Congress party chief, as opposed to a third party.
"That is a way out," Jairam Ramesh told reporters. He also said the government was mulling introducing a separate bill to tackle graft in the lower orders of bureaucracy, which had been another demand from Hazare.
With key state elections next year that pave the way for a 2014 general election, the government is keen to end a crisis that has paralysed policy making and parliament and added to Singh's unpopularity amid high inflation and corruption scams.
At least 50,000 people protested on Sunday to support Hazare and on Monday, a holiday in the capital, thousands came again carrying flags, banners and shouting slogans like "long live the revolution."
Hazare's campaign has struck a chord with India's rising middle class, many sick of endemic bribes and angry at a series of corruption scandals that have touched top politicians and businessmen in Asia's third largest economy.
Hazare's team members have said this is not a fast to death -- he is also drinking water. The activist has carried out scores of hunger strikes against governments in the last few decades.
"Our demand that they pass the bill by the end of the month remains unchanged. It's what the people want," Bedi said.
Criticism of Hazare's hunger strike has also surfaced from activists who say it is setting a bad precedent by holding democratic institutions hostage.
"While his means may be Gandhian, Anna Hazare's demands are certainly not," Booker prize-winning novelist and social activist Arundhati Roy wrote in The Hindu newspaper.
"The (Hazare) bill is a draconian anti corruption law in which a panel of carefully chosen people will administer a giant bureaucracy."
In another sign of the tentative efforts by a fumbling government to take the initiative, a Congress party lawmaker has also sent Hazare's bill to a parliamentary committee for consideration, meeting a demand of the protesters.
"The government and Team Anna are in back channel negotiations. So that's a start," said Anirudh Goenka, a 36-year-old social worker, at the protest. "Maybe we will not achieve everything the Jan Lokpal set out to do, but even a compromise is a way forward."
Hazare was briefly jailed last Tuesday, a move the government sought to reverse quietly. But he refused to leave prison until the government allowed him to continue his vigil, in public, for 15 days. He was released on Friday to huge cheering crowds and widespread media coverage.
For many, the pro-Hazare movement has highlighted the vibrant democracy of an urban generation that wants good governance rather than government through regional strongmen or caste ties -- a transformation that may be played out in 2012 state polls.
Several scandals, including a telecoms bribery scam that may have cost the government up to $39 billion, led to Hazare demanding anti-corruption measures. But the government bill creating an anti-graft ombudsman was criticised as too weak as it exempted the prime minister and the judiciary from probes.
Cricket-England thrash India to complete 4-0 whitewash
England won the toss, and elected to bat first ENGLAND: 591/6 decl INDIA 300, 283-all out (91.0 Ovs) England won by an innings and 8 runs MOM: Ian Bell MOS: Stuart Broad, Rahul Dravid | India in England, 2011 The Brit Oval, London, England August 18-22, 2011 Umpires: Simon Taufel(Aus), Rod Tucker(Aus) Third Umpire: Steve Davis(Aus) Match Referee: Ranjan Madugalle(SL) |
- Scorecard:
- England Ist Inning
- India Ist Inning
- India IInd Inning
Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets | NoBall | Wide | Eco |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RP Singh | 34.0 | 7 | 118 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.47 |
Ishant Sharma | 31.0 | 7 | 97 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.13 |
S Sreesanth | 29.0 | 2 | 123 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4.24 |
Suresh Raina | 19.0 | 2 | 58 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3.05 |
Amit Mishra | 38.0 | 3 | 170 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 4.47 |
Sachin Tendulkar | 2.0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.50 |
Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets | NoBall | Wide | Eco |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
James Anderson | 16.0 | 7 | 49 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3.06 |
Stuart Broad | 21.0 | 3 | 51 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2.43 |
Tim Bresnan | 17.0 | 3 | 54 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 3.18 |
Graeme Swann | 31.0 | 5 | 102 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3.29 |
Kevin Pietersen | 7.0 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.86 |
Ravinder Bopara | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets | NoBall | Wide | Eco |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
James Anderson | 17.0 | 4 | 54 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3.18 |
Stuart Broad | 20.0 | 6 | 44 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2.20 |
Graeme Swann | 38.0 | 6 | 106 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2.79 |
Tim Bresnan | 11.0 | 2 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.73 |
Ravinder Bopara | 3.0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.33 |
Kevin Pietersen | 2.0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.50 |
Sabtu, 20 Agustus 2011
Differences between Jan Lokpal Bill and Govt Bill
The streets are witnessing a demand that the government's Lok Pal Bill be replaced by the Jan Lok Pal Bill (JLP) as drafted by the team led by Anna Hazare. There are several significant differences between the two bills. In this note, we describe the some of these differences.
First, there is a divergence on the jurisdiction of the Lok Pal. Both bills include ministers, MPs for any action outside Parliament, and Group A officers (and equivalent) of the government.
The government Bill includes the Prime Minister after he demits office whereas the JLP includes a sitting Prime Minister. The JLP includes any act of an MP in respect of a speech or vote in Parliament (which is now protected by Article 105 of the Constitution). The JLP includes judges; the government Bill excludes them. The JLP includes all government officials, while the government Bill does not include junior (below Group A) officials. The government Bill also includes officers of NGOs who receive government funds or any funds from the public; JLP does not cover NGOs.
Second, the two Bills differ on the composition. The government Bill has a chairperson and up to 8 members; at least half the members must have a judicial background. The JLP has a chairperson and 10 members, of which 4 have a judicial background.
Third, the process of selecting the Lok Pal members is different. The JLP has a two stage process. A search committee will shortlist potential candidates. The search committee will have 10 members; five of these would have retired as Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner or Comptroller and Auditor General; they will select the other five from civil society. The Lok Pal chairperson and members will be selected from this shortlist by a selection committee. The selection committee consists of the Prime Minister, the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, two Supreme Court judges, two high court chief justices, the Chief Election Commissioner, the Comptroller and Auditor General and all previous Lok Pal chairpersons.
The government Bill has a simpler process. The selection will be made by a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the leaders of Opposition in both Houses of Parliament, a Supreme Court judge, a high court chief justice, an eminent jurist and an eminent person in public life. The selection committee may, at its discretion, appoint a search committee to shortlist candidates.
Fourth, there are some differences in the qualifications of a member of the Lok Pal. The JLP requires a judicial member to have held judicial office for 10 years or been a high court or Supreme Court advocate for 15 years. The government Bill requires the judicial member to be a Supreme Court judge or a high court chief justice. For other members, the government Bill requires at least 25 years experience in anti-corruption policy, public administration, vigilance or finance. The JLP has a lower age limit of 45 years, and disqualifies anyone who has been in government service in the previous two years.
Fifth, the process for removal of Lok Pal members is different. The government Bill permits the president to make a reference to the Supreme Court for an inquiry, followed by removal if the member is found to be biased or corrupt. The reference may be made by the president (a) on his own, (a) on a petition signed by 100 MPs or (c) on a petition by a citizen if the President is then satisfied that it should be referred. The President may also remove any member for insolvency, infirmity of mind or body, or engaging in paid employment.
The JLP has a different process. The process starts with a complaint by any person to the Supreme Court. If the court finds misbehaviour, infirmity of mind or body, insolvency or paid employment, it may recommend his removal to the President.
Sixth, the offences covered by the bills vary. The government Bill deals only with offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The JLP, in addition, includes offences by public servants under the Indian Penal Code, victimization of whistleblowers and repeated violation of citizen's charter.
Seventh, the government Bill provides for an investigation wing under the Lok Pal. The JLP states that the CBI will be under the Lok Pal while investigating corruption cases.
Eighth, the government Bill provides for a prosecution wing of the Lok Pal. In the JLP, the CBI's prosecution wing will conduct this function.
Ninth, the process for prosecution is different. In the government Bill, the Lok Pal may initiate prosecution in a special court. A copy of the report is to be sent to the competent authority. No prior sanction is required. In the JLP, prosecution of the Prime Minister, ministers, MPs and judges of Supreme Court and high courts may be initiated only with the permission of a 7-judge bench of the Lok Pal.
Tenth, the JLP deals with grievance redressal of citizens, in addition to the process for prosecuting corruption cases. It requires every public authority to publish citizen's charters listing its commitments to citizens. The government Bill does not deal with grievance redressal.
Given the widespread media coverage and public discussions, it is important that citizens understand the differences and nuances. This may be a good opportunity to enact a law which includes the better provisions of each of these two bills.
New Android tablet launches for $99
The Magnum Pepper
The $99 base model tablet, named Magnum Pepper Tablet PC, works on Google’s Android 2.2 OS and comes with an 800 MHz processor and 256MB RAM. It has a 7-inch LCD sensitive touch display, but the display type hasn’t been divulged. Whether it’s capacitive or resistive might make a big impact in the tablet’s sales. We’re pinning our hopes on a capacitive touch screen. However, it’s more likely to be a resistive one. Furthermore, the base model will have Wi-Fi, RJ45 LAN port, USB 2.0, MicroSD card support up to 32GB, 3G compatible dongle, 3.5mm jack, G-sensors, front camera and built-in 2GB of memory. With all these features and at that price this tablet is definitely a steal!Price Comparison Chart
We’ve drawn a comparison between four of the major tablets currently and you can gauge the price difference between the Magnum Pepper and the rest. The price is definitely impressive and may directly compete with the Reliance 3G tablet and Beetel Teletech’s Magiq tablet. However, it’s the specs and the performance that will eventually decide the fate of the tablet. But, it seems that local competition has increased and that is nothing but good news for consumers.VAIO C Notebooks available in any colour you like
Sony’s latest series of trendy notebooks, the VAIO C, comes in many colours including red, orange and black. The outer shell of the notebook is primarily made up of translucent plastic, making it look more like a kid’s toy than anything else.
The lid has a bit of flex, but the screen is sturdy and doesn’t ripple when its edged are pinched. The chiclet-style keyboard is backlit and the best part with an ambient light sensor automatically turning it on or off according to the lighting conditions.
Horsepower
The notebook may look like a toy, but it packs in serious horsepower beneath those flashing lights. Intel’s Core i5-2410M takes centrestage, running at a speed of 2.3GHz with the ability to turbo up to 2.9GHz. There’s a single 4GB DDR3 memory stick, so you can add another one yourself later. For storage, you get a 500GB hard drive spinning at 7200rpm. The C series makes for a decent gaming laptop as well, with AMD’s HD 6630M and dynamic switchable graphics.
The 14-inch LED backlit screen sports a resolution of 1366x768, which is good enough for general and multimedia playback. The 1.3MP webcam also features Sony’s ‘Exmor’ video engine for a clearer picture. The Core i5 processor is a very capable performer for everyday tasks and copes well even under stress. Games run fairly well too.
Keyboard is great
At 2.45kg, you’ll definitely feel the VAIO’s weight in your backpack. That aside, the keyboard is a dream to use with great play. Even while charging, the notebook only gets a bit warm, which is impressive. Finally, the built-in speakers are loud and clear but lack bass.
Switchable graphics
This is one of the first notebooks we’ve come across which has a dynamically switching graphics card. The Catalyst software in the notebook has a new option called ‘Switchable Graphics’ that lets you configure which programmes use the dedicated graphics card and which ones use the onboard hardware. But this feature is not as polished as compared to Nvidia’s Optimus.
Average battery life
Under average usage, you should easily manage 2.5-3 hours with ‘Power Saver Mode’ on and brightness level set to medium.
What we like
Good choice of colours
Powerful Intel Core i5 processor.
Easy to install a new hard disk or memory
What we don’t
Average battery life of only 2.5-3 hours
Switchable graphics not as good as Nvidia’s Optimus
Verdict
At R 55,990 for the model we tested (VPCCA15FG), the VAIO C is a good buy given its features and performance. Funky looks apart, it has ample firepower under all the hippie lighting effects. Highlights include the auto-switchable graphics, auto-backlighting of the keyboard and a comfortable keyboard. It can also handle DX10 games pretty well without compromising too much on quality. Just watch out for so-so battery life and the weight.
Hazare runs into civil society protest
The National Campaign for People’s Right to Information has rejected Anna Hazare’s Jan Lokpal bill and said it had sent its version of the proposed anti-graft law to the parliamentary standing committee that is examining the Centre’s draft.
At a media interaction today, NCPRI members Aruna Roy and Harsh Mander, who are also part of the Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council (NAC), emphasised the importance of the standing committee which, they said, has in the past strengthened bills initially regarded as “feeble”.
They also said setting deadlines for passing bills challenged the underpinnings of democracy, whose essence was “holding wide-ranging consultations and discussions, allowing for dissent and evolving a consensus”.
As Hazare and his colleagues rubbished the Centre’s invite for suggestions on its Lokpal bill through media ads, Aruna said they had despatched their draft today and were waiting for a call from the parliamentary panel.
She also said the NCPRI met most of the Opposition parties, including the BJP and the Left, and were responded to “favourably”.
Aruna, a right to information campaigner for years, underlined the role of the committee, saying several amendments had been incorporated into the RTI law.
Asked what she thought of Hazare’s fast, she said: “It is justified, democratic and constitutional. He has the right to protest and dissent. But nobody can claim it as an absolute right and deny the right of dissent to others.”
NCPRI member and RTI activist Shekhar Singh criticised Hazare’s colleague and lawyer Shanti Bhushan for suggesting that the government was free to make “minor” changes in the Jan Lokpal bill with Team Anna’s “permission” and ensure its passage in the ongoing monsoon session.
“This is very dangerous. Mobilising 50,000 or a lakh of people on the streets does not give anyone the right to appropriate Parliament’s functioning. Tomorrow, by the same logic, they might say we want to take over the courts, the security forces and demand a role in amending the Constitution,” Singh said, adding that lawyer Prashant Bhushan, also a Hazare adherent, was an “old associate” of his.
Aruna explained why they believed Parliament and legislative processes were sacrosanct even in the face of “people’s power”.
“The Lokpal issue was flagged in the public domain because of public pressure and nobody disputes this fact,” she said. “But those who make laws, craft their phraseology, vet and pass them are empowered to do so by the Constitution. But there exist structures of the state that can be accessed by civilians and worked upon by them. Although people struggling on the streets often make governments cognisant of their issues, we should learn to use government structures with maturity.”
Aruna, who was an IAS officer before quitting to work on grass-roots movements, added: “I was a collector once. But today I can’t be engaged in street struggles and simultaneously demand that I should be allowed to exercise the powers of a collector. I am happy to sit on the street with people and let the collector do his job.”
Mander, also a former bureaucrat, said this was “not the first movement” to have drawn people to the streets.
“Labour struggles have led to the passage of pro-labour laws, women’s groups pressured government to radically alter the law on rape and domestic violence and Dalit groups have fought for Dalit laws. People have the right to demand laws but it should be done through a system.”
The NAC members were, however, quick to clarify that they did not come as the government’s representatives and ran down the official Lokpal bill as “weak, inadequate and dangerous in places”.
They also tried to counter the perception that the NAC was a super law-making mechanism and claimed it was “part of the pre-legislative process”.
Selasa, 16 Agustus 2011
Pics: Farewell Shammi Kapoor
Shah Rukh Khan outside the residence of Shammi Kapoor. |
Actress Karisma Kapoor and her husband Sanjay Kapur at Shammi Kapoor's residence. |
Actor Neil Nitin Mukesh visits Shammi Kapoor's residence to pay his condolences. |
Actor Prem Chopra leaves the residence of veteran Bollywood actor Shammi Kapoor after paying his respects. |
Actor Rani Mukherjee arrives at Shammi Kapoor's residence to pay her respects. |
Actor Shashi Kapoor is assisted into a vehicle after paying his respects to brother Shammi Kapoor following his death. |
Shammi Kapoor's nephew Rishi Kapoor at his uncle's residence. |
Amitabh Bachchan during the last rituals. |
Film director Subhash Ghai pays his respects to the late Shammi Kapoor. |
Aditya Raj Kapoor, Rishi Kapoor and Anil Ambani carry Shammi Kapoor on the bier for his last journey. |
Shammi Kapoor's son Aditya Raj Kapoor performs the last rites for his father. |
Ranbir Kapoor helps carry the mortal remains of his grand-uncle Shammi Kapoor. |
Actor Aamir Khan at the funeral of Shammi Kapoor. |
Shammi Kapoor's son Aditya Raj Kapoor mourns his father's death. |
Shammi Kapoor's nephews (L to R) Rajiv, Rishi and Randhir thank people for paying their regards. |
Actor Priyanka Chopra pays condolences. |
Shammi Kapoor's grand-niece Kareena Kapoor with beau Saif Ali Khan at the veteran actor's residence. |
Now Watch Your Favourite Bollywood Movies on Yahoo MoviePlex!
Movieplex is a video space and users can enjoy licensed full-length movies for free. The portal has collaborated with production houses for the same and are offering movies like "Rock On", "Rann", and "Dil To Baccha Hai Ji".
According to a report by market research leader ComScore, the Indian audience is currently spending over 9.1 billion minutes watching online videos each month with entertainment as the leading category in online video content consumption ahead of news and sports content.
Arun Tadanki, managing director, Yahoo!, feels Movieplex would be successful in providing guilt-free entertainment to the consumers.
"Over 30 million internet users consume 1.7 billion videos every month across India. With the increasing demand for online video, both consumers and content providers are looking for a trusted destination where quality content can be consumed in a piracy-free environment at their leisure," he said.
"Movieplex is an example of how Yahoo! connects people to what matters to them the most and Indian movie lovers now have the best full-length movies available to them at their convenience," he added.
Movies Available on MoviePlex
- AAKROSH
- DIL TOH BACCHA HAI JI
- ROCK ON
- RANN
- LAMHAA
- CROOK
- RAKHT CHARITRA